We didn't focus in on that writ large across the entire offender population, but we did look at whether or not culturally appropriate and restorative options were considered for indigenous offenders. These are options such as healing lodges or work with elders, and really that whole concept of considering indigenous social history, which has been codified into legislation and should be done.
We looked at a group of files, about 20 files, where we saw the custody rating scale being overridden and the indigenous offender being placed in a higher security institution. What was concerning was that we saw no evidence of their indigenous social history being considered in those 20 files. There was no documentation of it. That doesn't mean it didn't happen, but we saw no proof of it happening. That's why we recommended that more needs to be done around overrides, but also codifying and solidifying the considering of indigenous social history in the way it's supposed to be considered. That's not to be more punitive but to help for better restoration.