Again, this basically says, which is absolutely true, all of this would be a valid exercise of the committee's powers and that may address confidentiality concerns. They may or they may not.
And again there are people who have seen the agreement who understand what the scope of the risk is and they can come and advise the committee on that scope of risk, or alternatively, maybe now that they have the knowledge of the motion and where the committee wants to go, they can get an agreement with the suppliers to drop that or come up with an alternative.
I don't think any of these things are unreasonable. All that this would do is delay the discussion on this and a solution to the next committee meeting. Because I actually don't want to filibuster, I am stopping now.
Thank you.