Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I also take exception to the fact that any of us would breach our requirements for in camera sessions. There are laws that ensure that. Just from a parliamentary position, I don't think we should cast doubt on that procedure, because it's an important procedure of Parliament. It's an important procedure for all of us. Not just on this committee, but in Canada and in any western democracy, that is an institution we need to value no matter which party you represent, no matter what evidence you need to see. In camera is a very important forum that even the government benches acknowledged the importance of just a minute ago by moving to go in camera.
If we didn't believe in those principles and how valuable they are, then we wouldn't be utilizing it as a tool of measure, but beyond that, which is in some ways offensive.... I know, Han, that you weren't meaning it to be offensive to any one member here or accusing any one member here, but I would like to recommend caution on that.
I am torn on two items of this motion. One is the issue of the calendar. We did, in fact, have a lot of calendar space, Chair, just to repeat what you said. Do we have enough time to satisfy this request without amending or changing the existing action plan, in particular in consideration of some of the meetings we have with the minister?