Right. I'm happy to continue.
The point was made, and I don't mean it as disrespect when I say that members have missed that we do have previous cases where non-disclosure agreements have been signed by MPs. That's something that is, I think, central to what we're trying to sort out here tonight.
I also made reference to it before, but maybe I can put it back to you, Chair, and to the clerk to sort that question out once and for all, because I'm no authority on this. Perhaps it can be looked at further by the clerk to understand whether or not I'm correct in my assessment, but, yes, I think that this point about precedent is something that can't be dismissed.
I have some other thoughts, Chair, but I don't want to take up time from others. You said that there are others who have a point they want to make.