Thank you, Mr. Chair, and members of the committee. This is my first time appearing at this committee. I've met some of you, but for the others, I'm pleased to be here today.
I've been 21 months in government, having spent about 30 years in the private sector before that so I'm still in my “firsts” as I go through all of these different exercises.
As chief information officer of Canada, I provide overall leadership for the management of information technology, information management and service and digital transformation within the Government of Canada. As you see me sitting here with my colleagues today, we could have another 100 people here with all of the departments. It's a team sport to modernize digital infrastructure in government, and certainly cybersecurity is as well.
We have legislation that we manage out of my department, including access to information and open government, and we have oversight for all of the major technology programs. We have accountability for the GC cybersecurity event management plan—that's a mouthful—GC CSEMP for short.
When it comes to the protection of Canadians' personal information, we set out policies, set cybersecurity requirements, and execute decisions on the management of cybersecurity risks on behalf of the government. This is through the policy on government security, the policy on service and digital and a number of different mechanisms that sit underneath that, such as the digital standards.
I have a couple of key messages in response to the AG's report. We welcome this report, and as noted by the auditor, we're at the baby steps. We are at the beginning of the beginning. This is a beautiful time for us to be getting these findings and have an opportunity to improve. In my experience in prior organizations, a strong audit function really helps technology organizations be better, and I look forward to continued work with the Auditor General on this and other files.
As I noted, we're at the very beginning of the modernization of our technology environment. Only 35% of the systems in the Government of Canada are in a healthy state, and the cloud is a key to modernizing those systems. Cloud migration is one lever—and of note, private and public organizations all around the globe are dealing with this. I worked for several large Canadian companies, and some of the things that we've noticed here are things that we ran into in that environment.
The Government of Canada takes the protection of Canadians' information very seriously, and as Sony noted, not all services will be in the cloud. That is not our plan. We are going to have the cloud, and we are going to have enterprise data centres, and that is partially from a financial perspective and partially from a utility perspective. Cloud guardrails, a standard set of controls, are going to evolve over time. The threat landscape changes. The environment technically changes, so we'll be tuned to that. We will continue to strengthen oversight and compliance mechanisms for cloud use across government to make sure there's very clear guidance and compliance.
Since the Auditor General's report, I want to talk about a couple of areas of progress. We have updated our cloud roles and responsibilities document, and a corresponding matrix, and published it internally, so that our team members have access to that. In November 2022, we updated the Government of Canada cybersecurity event management plan. This is the plan that we put in place to respond to enterprise government cybersecurity incidents. This was first published in 2015, and we continue to test, review and tune that plan. That's normal practice with any type of a cybersecurity plan. In fact, about four weeks ago, we completed an “on guard”, which is a simulation that we run across government. It included a cloud component as part of that review, so we are starting to test our response to cyber incidents in the cloud.
In January, we also published an updated cloud strategy that had been in the works for several months. We've changed the language from “cloud first” to “cloud smart”, and that really identifies the fact that we are not always just going to go to the cloud, but are going to balance the decision-making on a number of factors, including financial.... Cloud first was exactly the right strategy for the government to move forward. We needed to start directing people into new technology, so it got the ship moving in the right direction, for lack of a better way of saying it. We have about 800 of our applications in the cloud. That's still a very small percentage of overall systems that we have across government.
Of note, in January, I issued guidance out of my office on the classification of personal information in the cloud and, in coordination with many of the people around this table, came to a decision that we are going to designate some high-value assets—personal information being an example—and some systems that would have an additional set of controls put in place to protect them even further. Our benefits delivery modernization program, which houses a lot of Canadians' data, is a good example of where we'll be deploying on that.
Finally, on continued development of a cloud costing model—and Sony talked about that already—we're looking to have that ready for publication in summer or fall. We've done a lot of work on that already. That is going to help departments make informed decisions about moving to the cloud, and not just the cost of moving to the cloud but the cost of operating in cloud. Both of those things are very helpful to understand. That will fulfill our responsibilities as it relates to recommendation 4.
In closing, our ultimate goal is to provide Canadians, Canadian businesses and all service users with the high-quality and efficient service that they expect in a digital age. Cloud is going to be a part of that. We will be regularly managing our progress on achieving this ambition, and cloud is an important part of that plan.
Once again, Mr. Chair, thank you for your invitation to speak to you today. I welcome any questions you may have.