Right, and this is what I want to get at, again, to follow up on Mr. Kram's and Mr. Desjarlais's comments. Taxpayers are shovelling almost a half a billion dollars a year to Via, yet it takes the Auditor General's report to get Via to act on accessibility issues. How could this have happened, and how is it acceptable that taxpayers are handing over $400 million, yet a large number of Canadians are excluded from proper service?
This is not like dealing with old infrastructure. I understand that perhaps a station somewhere has limited use and limited infrastructure, but these are some very basic things that other companies without $400 million in subsidies can get done for Canadians. How did this happen?