I would argue that all of the aid we undertake is driven by a feminist approach to delivering international assistance.
That means multiple things. One thing it means—and this is one of the targets in the policy—is that we will specifically work with partners to design types of programming that directly address gender inequality, so that it is the purpose of the project. It informs all of our spending.
We have very long-term relationships with some multilateral organizations, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. We have been a member of that for 20 years. Since the feminist international assistance policy, we continue to support that organization, but we have taken a far more aggressive role on the board—we have a seat on the board—to encourage and ensure that the organization also adopts a much more focused approach to gender equality. That's one way.
Across our other development assistance projects, we integrate gender outcomes across all of our projects. They vary according to what the type of project is. There are some projects where you can have gender equality results that are built into the program that you can understand in an immediate sense. Then there are others where quite honestly it's more difficult and it's less possible to have a gender equality result per se. Every single project receives the analysis to tell us what is possible, what is needed and what we should do within each and every project.
We work with partners. Often, these partners are women's rights organizations on the ground in the countries in which they are operating. They tell us what their needs are. We work with them to build out what makes sense from the perspective of supporting that women's rights organization to do its job. Then we build the program around that.