There are a couple of ways. It depends on the context within which we're working. I'll use an example of working in a partner country with a local partner, let's say.
I can talk to you about a fantastic project we have in Tanzania, looking to help girls stay in school. We work with local partners to build out their logic model of what their efforts are going to accomplish.
That includes, as one of the elements, as I mentioned, the project performance measurement framework. It includes ultimate outcomes, intermediate and immediate outcomes, and the host of activities that are designed to support that. It should be noted that, when we're working with partners in that way, it's the partners themselves who build those frameworks. We work with them closely. We encourage them to choose the proper indicators, whether they be performance indicators on outputs or performance indicators on outcomes, to ensure they line up to the best of their ability with things such as the SDG indicators, but it is the partner who builds those frameworks.
We then work with the partners to ensure the proper execution of the project. One of the core elements that we do is a gender-based analysis. We do a gender-based analysis—now called gender-based analysis plus—across every single one of the projects. For all the 1,500 projects I've mentioned, we do that analysis.
That analysis is used for two reasons, basically. The first one is to enable us to determine exactly what type of a project it is. That is the gender coding you would have seen in the report. The other thing it does is that it enables us to help the partners to better integrate the gender learnings we have on the ground in their work. That is just one example of how we go about doing that.