Right, and just to demystify this for those who are watching, the difference between an output and an outcome is something like this. An output is how many doctors' visits were funded for women needing a particular kind of service. An outcome is what the health outcomes are across a population. You can say that we spent a lot of money and we facilitated a certain number of doctor visits, but if that didn't actually change the health status of people overall, then you haven't achieved your outcome. If you're measuring outputs and not outcomes, then you're not actually measuring whether or not you're making a difference.
Just to go back to the officials in the time I have left, I think we've clearly established the point that you don't actually know if your policy is making a difference in terms of outcomes, and that you cannot in fact assert that we're making a tangible impact, because you're not measuring outcomes. Do you acknowledge that?