Once again, you're bordering on our mandate. I'm saying the analogy you gave that someone would have their home, their garden and their pension is our objective in what we do.
We spent time on our mandate specifically to say how much does that line “for the long-term benefit of our beneficiaries,” or wording to that effect, actually mean?
There is no explicit social purpose in the mandate for how we manage the money. I don't think I can express my personal view here when I'm representing PSP.