I'll go back to Mr. Hayes. Another section of the report that I found a little bit interesting was about the application assessment process. On page 20, in paragraph 12.69, you outlined how in three out of four programs there were some inconsistences there.
Let me ask it this way. Whenever you do your analysis and review of these programs—you noted that in terms of the application process some were not always followed or documented—do you take a look, peeling another layer off the onion, for lack of a better expression, at whether, in lieu of that process, there were other factors that influenced the decision of successful or rejected applications?
For example, if a minister, a member of Parliament, a lobbyist, or a business or community leader was advocating, would you take a look at correspondence or anything around ATIP-ing the conversations that go around the application review process itself?