That's great.
My follow-up question is with regard to the indigenous communities.
I see there was mention of results showing the “considerable variation in price increases and decreases across food items and communities. For example, in 13 of the eligible communities, more than half of the subsidized food items we examined increased in cost when the higher subsidy rates applied, while in 9 other communities, more than half of the food items decreased in price.”
Why is that? I find it very interesting.
For some communities, after the subsidy kicked in, some prices went up and some went down. Why is that?