That was exactly where I was going to go, Mr. Hayes. Not only can you answer the questions well, you can also ask them. Kudos to you, sir.
To further that, if you can—and I understand that there may be some reasons why you might not want to—give us some insight into some of the lenses. One would be the lobbyist registry and one would be political donations. Are there other lenses that you apply when there may not have been anything unethical that happened? I think you've said in this case that you don't think there is. However, where there are sole-sourced contracts, what types of lenses do you apply to assure Canadians that there isn't wrongdoing?