Thank you.
I want to ask our colleague a question.
I understand why the Minister of Indigenous Services is mentioned in the motion. I'm not perplexed, that's probably not the right word, but I'm looking for an explanation as to why the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations is mentioned.
Are there land claims issues that add a layer of complexity with respect to water services somehow? Logistically—and it is mostly a question around logistics—why is it the two ministers instead of the one when we've heard at this committee and others, in very clear terms, that the focus of water is the business of the Minister of Indigenous Services Canada?