Okay, sure.
I think what Canadians really don't understand is how these projects are reviewed for maintenance, how they're reviewed for operations and how they ultimately get precedence in terms of expenditure by the NCC.
I think other expenditures that I'd like to make a comment on are those of Stornoway. We see $644 for a new leader of the opposition to move in there. That's a huge price tag just to change the locks. Most Canadians don't go through that process. There's $170,000 for cleaning that same residence, taxpayer-funded, and over $100,000 for regular operations and maintenance. These things pile up. It's going to be way past $8 million in a short period of time. In the amount of time the opposition has been in there, it's been over $8 million.
In terms of the NCC, taxpayer-funded money, and the request, review and procedure by the NCC, within procurement, how are those functions actually dealt with in terms of the very initial setting of being reviewed as requiring maintenance? How do we reconcile the process? Could you walk us through that process so that I and other Canadians can have some understanding as to how the NCC operates in terms of reviewing need, assessing that need and then ultimately creating an expenditure?