This gives me an opportunity to blend a few answers here.
It's difficult to say whether or not we would have gone in to audit SDTC without the allegations, but we always monitor the budget implementation acts and the amounts that organizations get. SDTC, for example, is in the public accounts, so it's a component that we look at in our financial audit work.
With a large amount of money and a big program, it's possible that we would have gone in again at some point. The fact that we have the “follow the dollar” mandate in our act is a very important tool for us. We didn't have that before, and we wouldn't have had the ability to do what we're doing right now.
The biggest constraint that I'm worried about is the scope of the funding agreement and the limits we might have. I don't think there are going to be any real constraints for us in this, apart from the human resources side, but we still have to determine that.