No, no, I appreciate that. I'm not arguing about that. The value for money is there. I'm saying that the value for money, however, could have been different should you have been capitalized the correct amount of money to begin with. This decision, which was first made in 2018, to bring on board a public contractor that would garnish profits off of a public project was only enabled because of deferred maintenance. You said that—correct?
On November 21st, 2023. See this statement in context.