That's correct. Basically, that's just prudent in terms of.... I come from the municipal sector, and one of the things we are disciplined to do is just that. Otherwise, you run into an infrastructure deficit and things, quite frankly, cost probably triple, if not quadruple, if you put them off by deferring a lot of that maintenance.
With that, you have your asset management plan—I want to spell this out so that everybody gets a visual of this—and you have the funding that goes along with it and you prioritize.
I'm assuming that this particular project is part of that asset management plan, as well as the funding allocation that would be attached to it. Also, because of its condition, it was prioritized.