Yes, I understand that, and I do appreciate the answer.
The CEO of the NCC also told the committee that there were “no concerns raised by the...Auditor General related to” the $8-million barn. He said that, “frankly,” in terms of “the audit record over the last five years”, there was “no general concern that required action or follow-up by the NCC.”
To me, that leaves the impression that your office did not see any issues with the NCC's spending $8 million on a barn. Do you agree with that statement based on his interpretations?