I'm sorry; your mike was not coming through clearly.
I think your colleague asked a fairly similar question.
We did a survey with a whole bunch of different groups, like I said, external and internal stakeholders to see how we could make the public accounts a lot more friendly. What came through some of the information was the level of effort to prepare. There's a lot of stuff in there. If you take volume 3, where, as an example, we have claims against the Crown of $100, you have to report everything above $100. That limit has been there for 25, 30 or 40 years. Again, how can we potentially revamp the thresholds, recognizing that it's not 40 years ago, to make sure we report what is valuable information?
We have a potential way forward on what we've heard and the types of changes that we may be looking for. For example, again in volume 3, all of the revolving funds statements appear there. It would probably be safe to say they could be on the departmental websites, and it would probably be sufficient.
What is the user of the public accounts really looking for? That is what we're trying to get at, items like that.
Thank you.