Yes. It's the House of Commons Procedure and Practice, third edition, chapter 12, “The Process of Debate”, page 541. It states that:
An amendment is out of order, procedurally, if:
it is irrelevant to the main motion ([meaning] it deals with a matter foreign to the main motion, exceeds the scope, or introduces a new proposition which should properly be the subject of a separate substantive motion with notice);
It raises a question substantially the same as one which the House [or the committee] has decided in the same session or conflicts with an amendment already agreed to;
it is completely contrary to the main motion and would produce the same result as the defeat of the main motion;