I think that at the time of the use of GCMS numbers, because they were assigned to perhaps an older employee, it didn't mean that a new person couldn't come in to take a look at that code, so I'm not going to comment specifically on the 2018 case.
I think what I have found in my role in this department is that there are times when a file has been sitting for a long time and it gets to my attention either because of direct client outreach or because the issue is raised by a member of Parliament, and we dig into it. At times it's also because we notice that there could be a missing document. There could be an abandoned file or a security check that's not complete, or there could be a material change in the application such that it requires more time.
I can't speak to the 2018 case you've brought forward, but what I can say is that those numbers are.... I don't think they're in use any more, and we took that to account last year when this first surfaced, so I don't think they're being assigned to that number at this point in time today. That was a change that was made about eight months ago.
Is that fair, a year ago...?