Thank you, Mr. Johns.
Your point of order is that you object to the meeting being called, which is not technically a point of order, but I wanted to give you time to speak.
I will address your first point. In fact, this committee previously invited the Office of the Auditor General to appear on this exact subject while that investigation was under way. It was viewed as a routine meeting that, again, was during a recess week, so there is certainly a precedent.
In terms of interference, we have a witness here today from the Office of the Auditor General, who is prepared to speak, so I don't quite follow the logic of this being interference.
I'll note that the previous meeting, which we had on October 12, not only resulted in information being shared publicly, which was noteworthy; it also resulted in the Auditor General then taking steps to ensure that the committee's concerns were addressed in the current report.
I've heard your point of order. Again, I listened to more to allow you to get it on the record, but the meeting is going to proceed.
We're not in debate. If you have a point of order, say, “Point of order”. Otherwise, I want to hear from Mr. Hayes.
Are there any other points of order?