As I mentioned in the earlier line of questioning, we are relying more and more on the expertise that we can actually bring through the public service. The goal is to reduce the reliance on consultants in IRCC to around 13% in the next three years in the office of the chief information officer.
Most of our consultants are IT consultants who are helping us with a very complex system. Maintaining a small, targeted use of consultants is a prudent and common procedure for temporary needs. The second is the search capacity, which we need, knowledge transfer, and also upscaling. We also have specialized expertise, which we probably need to maintain on that. An important part that we have set up over time is a target and a strategy that is focused on knowledge transfer.
The overall goal is to let go of 300 out of the 351 consultants we have by April 2028. It may sound like this is far away, but this is very aggressive in our world, where we are removing the reliance on consultants and training and hiring the public servants on that one. As of today, we have achieved a reduction of 127 of them. We are hiring people to backfill, but it is not one-to-one. We have approximately 52 new public servants who have been trained and are taking on the work of the 127 consultants we have let go.
This is our attempt to make sure that we have less reliance on consultants and more reliance on the in-house expertise. As we move forward with our transformation, these are the people who will support us for a longer period of time.