As somebody who used to be a general counsel, I very strongly believe in strong contracts and being able to show that you followed those contracts.
What I'm also trying to talk about, though, is a question of legal liability. I don't know how the Government of Canada could purport to recover the full $64 million paid to GC Strategies. One would be led to believe by some of my colleagues' comments that there's $64 million sitting in a GC Strategies bank account that the Government of Canada paid out. No: GC Strategies essentially paid its subcontractors. GC Strategies was hired to hire other individuals to do work. We have no evidence that GC Strategies didn't use this money, other than its profit margin, to pay out the subcontractors.
Is that correct?