Yes. If you look at exhibit 1.4, you see that the national adaptation strategy was essentially intended to be a three-legged stool, with the three components that you just talked about. Only one of those legs is in place, so it's a precarious strategy at the moment, with only one of those legs.
That federal action plan, which was the central component of the strategy, is in place, so I can confirm that there's a check mark for that. However, we do, later in the report, talk about gaps within that action plan. I wouldn't say that even that leg is a perfectly sturdy one. There are the problems outlined, including a prioritization of risks, an economic analysis and—a theme today—a value-for-money analysis, so there are issues associated with that one leg that is in place.