Thank you for clarifying that. Maybe that recalls some of the behaviour you mentioned over the last few years, which I would maybe call bad behaviour of this government over the last few years.
I have another question. On page 11 of your report, you highlighted that the government contractors must prove they did the work before getting paid, yet your findings show that in over 40% of the contracts examined, there was “little to no” proof that the work was actually done. However, the government departments still approved routine payments to GC Strategies.
I find that very concerning. I know that my constituents found that very concerning during the election. That was the question: If they're not doing the work, how are they getting paid? Who's looking at this? What's the oversight?
Is this normal, and how is this the case?