I think the spirit of this is fine. I think it's to show a form of accountability for those who indicate they will provide further information or a written response, and then a mechanism to follow up if this is not the case. I am fine with this as a standard practice, but more importantly, I do not think that eliminating it as a routine motion stops, prohibits or does not allow the committee to provide for shorter time frames for documents to be provided, as well as for the process and severity of the process to demand a follow-up for these.
Certainly, while I am fine with the disposing of routine motion one, I do not think it does dispose of our ability to demand documents in a series of different time frames and to escalate the demand for these documents in a manner of different formats.
Thank you.