Maybe I'll situate this more broadly. I may be echoing the remarks of Mr. Hayes.
Ultimately, as the head of the organization, I'm looking for the procurement to be value for money for Canadians, be transparent and be fair. Any outside perspective and recommendations looking objectively at the issues are helpful in us making continuous improvements to what is needed to make sure we stay at the cutting edge of where we need to be to have solid procurement processes.
What I can confirm, which I've said already in my testimony, is that we've put in place since that time a number of very important measures that ultimately put us in a much more solid place. One in particular is on documentation, which was identified as an issue not just in this report but in others. That has been rectified such that a contract cannot be awarded in my department anymore unless the documentation that's required has been checked off. That's a big improvement.
A question you also mentioned is whether there is more to be done. On the systems that have been put in place, I'm very confident that they'll deliver, but until we've actually monitored and seen that, we won't know.
At the end of the day, what I continue to do is make sure we put in place a solid monitoring system that can sample a number of contracts post-award to ensure the system worked as intended, and if it did not work as intended, we can make further adjustments.