Thank you. I'll be pretty brief.
I too made the trip to Regina, and it was very informative as to some of the procedures in other jurisdictions and how, hopefully, we can co-operate. It sounds like we're starting to have a bit of consensus already with a couple of them, including the report on the housing. That would be one of the issues we'd look at.
Another one I would want to support would be the professional services contracts.
The third one for me, one that has a little more priority, is the CEBA loans my colleague Mr. Kuruc mentioned. As somebody who was in public practice during the process, I did find there were a lot of issues with how it proceeded. I'd be interested to see how the follow-up was determined. I think there are a lot of issues we need to look at with regard to how the loans will be collected, but also, for those people whose loans were forgiven, whether or not it was actually reported as income and tying it back to CRA. It wasn't just the program itself and giving the money; it was also in taxing the portions that were forgiven in the first and second phases. That would be interesting to see. I didn't read any details on any of that.
The other part, which kind of ties into it, is the modernization of implementation. Mr. Deltell discussed how the modernizing of CRA was making it difficult and was becoming somewhat ageist or discriminatory toward those who are technically challenged in dealing with CRA.
Those are the reports I've looked at that would be of interest to me.
Thank you.