Okay. Thank you. I understand your question.
The program was designed in such a way that the properties are selected when the custodians offer their properties. The program doesn't seek out properties in specific areas. It accepts the properties that custodians have identified.
Those properties may be in the areas that are in the highest core housing need, or they may not be. They're certainly in communities with housing need, because every community has some amount of core housing need, but are they in the communities with the highest core housing needs? That's not necessarily the case, because they're supplied by the custodian. That is a fact of the way the program was designed.
On the definition of affordability that's used, there are different definitions of affordability used in different government programs. I agree that it would be ideal if there was one common definition of affordability, but you have to think about it in the context of what the program is trying to accomplish in terms of affordability and whether it's trying to get at the deepest affordability or something that's more affordable. Depending on the program objectives, you may find that there is a different definition.