Thank you. I appreciate your question.
To your statement, I am very apologetic that you felt we were passing the buck. That is certainly not the way Paul and I work. I can provide some clarity in terms of roles and responsibilities.
If the Auditor General concludes that a program has been administered poorly, that money is not going out fast enough or that it's a problem of administration, I am definitely the one at the table who is accountable for that. If the Auditor General says that, in the future, this program should use a different definition of affordability or that there should be some design difference in the program, then that is something Paul would address, because he's responsible now for designing the programs—or for the advice to government, which designs the programs. If it's about administration, that is absolutely me.
If we left any sense that we were passing the buck, I apologize for that. That's not our intention at all. It's very clear to us.