Here's my comment: In the programs we look at, there is an affordability criterion. Some programs have a criterion whereby 30% of the housing units must be rented for less than 80% of the median rent in the region. That tool isn't adjusted. It's extremely hard. That means that the price of 60% of the housing built corresponds to the market price. It depends on the intended objective.
In my opinion, the objective must be adjusted for affordability, but there must also be enough flexibility to take regional specificities into consideration. I heard that the next definition of affordable housing may allow such flexibility. Time will tell if that's true.