Just on the matter of CSIS, we haven't had a comment really of any substance from the director of CSIS yet at this point as to how they're going to deal with it. I understand we have to have a forward-looking element to it. If we're calling witnesses for it, I don't have any problem with the ones who have been suggested, but is it prudent to try to get CSIS in to get a statement from them on what has occurred to this point? There hasn't been anything largely that's been made public.
Members of the committee may feel it's sufficient to have the current director of operations. I'm just suggesting that we haven't really heard from CSIS on this matter, and we did have the commissioner of the RCMP in, so it would make sense to me that we also have the director of CSIS in.