You say that at that point in time, though, the RCMP was still giving to you, as the Solicitor General, information that stated or would lead you to believe there was still a possibility of considering Mr. Arar a terrorist. Did that continue to be their position? In other words, there are concerns raised by Justice O'Connor in terms of the information that was flowing forward at the time when that letter was put in front of you. Were the RCMP still conveying that same concern, the same directives that he was a person of interest and that he was a potential terrorist?
On October 24th, 2006. See this statement in context.