We have a responsibility to try to get to the bottom of these questions. Today we don't seem to be doing so well. Maybe we need to figure out whether more of that information would be forthcoming in camera.
I want to briefly pursue another line of questioning. Justice O'Connor concluded that for reasons of its own, CSIS preferred that Mr. Arar not return to Canada. He offered evidence for which that seemed to be the case. One reason was that CSIS was concerned that if detainees such as Mr. Arar were returned to Canada, CSIS would require more resources to monitor individuals. The second reason was that CSIS expressed concern that the U.S. government might question Canada's motives and resolve if Mr. Arar were released. I wonder if I could ask you to comment on those two conclusions by Justice O'Connor.
In other words, with the issue of resources, if that did apply at the time, would it still be the case? Secondly, there is the question of whether the information would have been more forthcoming and whether CSIS would have been more proactive if it weren't worried about causing problems with Canada's relationship with the United States.