I think Mr. Justice O'Connor has dealt with the issue of the reliability assessment at some length and come to his conclusions on that. Some were based on the fact that he judged that the individual responsible for that at the time did not have the appropriate training or background to recognize this as having been the case in respect of this information.
I tried to convey in my opening comments that since then the organization has taken a number of steps to ensure this would not happen now or in the future. Our policies and practices have been amended, in part in response to earlier reviews of Mr. Arar's case by the Security Intelligence Review Committee.
I think it's fair to say that the organization today is extremely cautious about dealing with information that may come from a country with a poor human rights record. Moreover, as a matter of principle and practice, the organization always seeks to corroborate information, irrespective of its provenance, before coming to any conclusion or any determination on it.
I guess Mr. Justice O'Connor has described the situation as it was in respect of Mr. Arar at the time. It's very regrettable that happened, but I think we have since taken steps to ensure that would not occur in the future.