I would say it is generally a strength in some respects, partly because of the recognition by employees of our organization that virtually anything and everything they do is subject to third-party review over the course of the year. That has the effect of generating perhaps a high level of due diligence and caution in how the organization works.
That's not to say the organization is mistake-free. It's an organization of human beings who can err from time to time, but I think the experience over the last 22 years of its existence has been that the review mechanisms—whether it's the Security Intelligence Review Committee, the Inspector General's office, or various other review mechanisms that exist in respect of CSIS, as they do with respect to any other member of the federal government—have been such as to make it an organization that is adaptive over time to the identification of shortcomings and taking steps to try to rectify those for future action.
On the whole, I think it has been a positive for the organization; and going back to an earlier question, it would hopefully have some impact in terms of public confidence that the organization is functioning as it should, in accordance with directives in law.