I can give you a personal view on that. First, leaving aside the moral issues, I would be suspicious of any information that may have been elicited under torture. People subjected to torture might say anything.
Secondly, as I tried to point out earlier, no matter what the providence of information we receive, it would be extraordinary for us to rely on single-source information. We rely wherever possible on multiple corroboration, irrespective of whether the information may have been obtained through torture. I think that tries to respond to your question.