As I said in response to an earlier question, that's a fairly common practice in western democracies. Personally, I see some benefits in it in terms of developing a better level of knowledge and understanding by members of Parliament of what organizations like ours do and how they do it, in part to address some of the misconceptions that may exist from time to time.
But I think also that national security issues are obviously a subject of normal great interest for governments and for elected officials of the country and that there is something going back to the issue of legitimacy and public confidence that could perhaps be bolstered through that kind of mechanism.