Essentially, that's what our submission to O'Connor said. We laid out about ten areas that we believed were really, really important--transparency, access to the information, the credibility and the trust of the review body, and all those things. We laid them out as what we believed was required.
We said at the same time that there may be a case to be made for not replicating all of the information and capability in terms of having top-secret-rated staff and individuals who have the familiarity with doing the kind of investigation into their files and their actions that we have to do with respect to CSIS. A lot of these skills and knowledge are transferrable, and there may be a case to be made to say that we could do the job. We're not trolling for more work. We're not looking for expansion of our mandate, but if we were called upon, we believe SIRC has the capability to do it. But this will be up to Mr. Justice O'Connor. I know he has consulted many, many people far and wide on this.