I believe that virtually every review that's been done with respect to terrorist acts in the world in recent years, starting from 9/11 on through to Justice O'Connor, has suggested that we need to have more sharing of information amongst the security and intelligence agencies of all the countries in the world, that it's absolutely fundamental to our desire to make this a safer place and to offer a secure environment for our citizens.
In that happening, the important thing is that we have protocols and agreements in place amongst these security and intelligence agencies that do put limitations, as I said in an earlier answer, on how the information can be used, with an assessment of the reliability of the information, caveats, and assurances to prevent misuse of it.
In the particular case you speak of...and I assume you're talking about Maher Arar and the fact that CSIS was not informed about certain actions early on in the piece when he was being detained and then ultimately sent over to Syria via Jordan. It is troublesome to understand how that could take place without there being some direct contact and information, but to the best of our investigation, that is what happened.