It's clear that one of the advantages that some of our counterparts have is that they aren't limited to dealing with just one of the elements of the whole family of security and intelligence gathering. In other words, in Norway and the U.K., among two, the oversight bodies would have the equivalent of CSIS, the police, the Communications Security Establishment, and border security all under their jurisdiction. That does give an advantage.
The disadvantage they have is that they can't go into the depth that we can and have the access to all of the top secret information that we do on the one agency that we are responsible for. So for every advantage, there's always a disadvantage.
So we learn and we try to sift and sort all of these things and say, should we be pursuing other things? At the moment, we have the wisdom of Mr. Justice O'Connor looking at whether or not he should do something with the RCMP oversight, and maybe that will give us some clue as to where we're heading.