I'm just saying that it's astonishing that a body charged with an intelligence mandate should not have known of a crucial intelligence bit of information, which turned out to be false and misleading, and only learned about it four years later because of the commissioner's and the inquiry's report and because Commissioner Zaccardelli came before this committee.
I find that astonishing. How could they possibly have had any relevant, authentic relations with the Syrian intelligence agencies if they didn't know about this fact that the information about Maher Arar, which was false and misleading, had been conveyed to the U.S. officials who brought about his rendition to Syria?
To me, it is astonishing that a committee involved with intelligence would not have known of this. It says something very disturbing about their relationship with the RCMP during that period. It says something very disturbing in terms of the accountability of CSIS and the RCMP, two civilian authorities, including the government. And in my view, this is something that the CSIS review committee should look into, because this, to me, is a very disturbing experience that has been revealed here.