There were two items in particular, the first being that the Syrian government claimed there were three separate occasions in which CSIS said they were not interested Maher Arar's return, including in a meeting that occurred in 2002. Now, it was more inferred in that 2002 meeting that that was said, but they did state there were three separate occasions in which that occurred.
The second is with respect to the fact that the individual who did the assessment of the information that came from the Syrian government did not have a background in torture. Justice O'Connor, in his report, stated that if that person did have an adequate background in torture, they would certainly have been alerted to the fact that it was highly likely that the information obtained from Maher Arar was done under duress and under torture.
Moving on, because I know I don't have a lot of time, do you feel at this point, before I go to questions around information flowing to the RCMP, that you've received full disclosure from CSIS with respect to this matter?