Good.
I wasn't going to go here, but would it be, in your view, since some people sitting at home watching may say, yes, they're trying to protect their job, but I don't think that's occurring here.... Despite the fact that I dislike intensely adding additional layers of administrative bureaucracy, would it perhaps be, then, based on what you've just said, a good reason to have a parliamentary oversight in addition to what you do? That parliamentary overseeing body could then access your group as well as those other agencies, so there would be that umbrella group able to coordinate through a parliamentary process.
In other words, the legislators would then--being sworn to secrecy, of course--have an oversight. Do you see a value in that, based on the best practices you've just referred to?