Can we get an indication of how supportive people are to getting the proper wording here? Should we continue to wait? How does this committee feel about the direction Mr. Comartin is taking us here? Are we spending a lot of time on clause 3 when maybe some of these other clauses should be discussed as well?
We're not voting on the amendment, but how do you feel about getting the proper wording on this? Could I see a show of hands from those who would like to continue pursuing this?
I think, Mr. Comartin, the indication is that even with the correct wording it might not fly. Should we proceed?
Mr. Holland has a comment.