I don't mean to interrupt the witness, but I'm aware of some of the actions the department is taking on a go-forward basis, and this committee is going to be looking at it in more detail. What I'm concerned with right now is the fact that we have conflicting information about who knew what and when they knew it; and specifically, we have problems knowing what was going on with the discussions of the one voice letter.
I don't agree with your conclusion that it's clear. In fact, I think it's quite unclear as to what the positions of both CSIS and the RCMP were at that point in time. So I'm asking for your assistance, I guess, as the department that was advocating for a one voice letter, in understanding what the objections of CSIS and the RCMP were.