Well, I think accountability is key, as I've already said. I think it can take many forms. You don't change a culture. You can change a culture in many ways, one of which is by moving people out and other people in. One is through training, and so on. I do agree that ongoing training is key. We need a culture where protocols are understood and respected, where the necessity for caveats and the testing of reliability become ingrained in any information-sharing exercise. Whether or not that also entails the disciplining of individual members of a unit, or the force, I think is a more difficult question.
I do go back to the fact that Mr. Justice O'Connor concluded there was no intentional action on the part of the RCMP to harm Mr. Arar, and that misinformation was in fact provided, which came about because certain processes weren't followed. But having said that, there was no malice directed toward Mr. Arar. In fact, Mr. Justice O'Connor concluded that no Canadian official was complicit in his deportation.
So I think you can't deal with the issue of discipline of an individual officer or officers without keeping in mind that context. I would say yes, if there were evidence that someone had deliberately misrepresented a situation in order to do Mr. Arar deliberate harm, absolutely, that would be an enormous breach.