I did look. That was my first entry into the file—looking at that exchange. That's contained in Justice O'Connor's report. He clearly states that. The members themselves, when they provided that information in 2002, were providing it not with the objective of correcting anything, because they actually didn't know that any errors had been made; this is one of the issues. They were simply responding to an American request as to whether they could arrest him or whether we could detain him. They simply gave him what we considered Mr. Arar to be in Canada, regardless of the mistakes, the mislabelling that had taken place.
The members only testified to the question of possibly having a corrective effect when they testified in front of Justice O'Connor. They said, if the Americans were unsure of what we had on him, what we told them at that time should have clearly put them in the knowledge that we couldn't arrest him or do anything with him.